小作文:
题型:表格题
The table below shows the percentage of men and women working in several sectors.
Compare and contrast.
大作文:
题材:政府类
Some people think that governments should do more to make their citizens have a healthy diet. Others, however, believe that individuals should be responsible for their own diet and health. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.(19/07/2014)
相同题目:
2010/4/17
Some people think the governments should act to decide how people live in order to make a healthier life. Others think individual should decide their own lifestyle. Discuss both views, and give your opinion.
有人认为政府应该决定人们如何生活才能拥有一个较健康的生活方式。其他人认为这应该由个人决定。讨论双边观点并给出你的看法。
相似题目:
2014/7/19
Some believe governments should do more to make citizens have a healthy diet, others believe individuals must take responsibility for their diets and health. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
一些人认为政府有责任来确保公民健康地饮食,而其他人认为个人必须承担起自己的饮食和健康的责任。讨论双方观点并给出你的看法。
回复可见答题思路和范文
本帖隐藏的内容
思路:
政府应该负责:
1. 这个措施能够迫使老百姓遵守健康的,卫生的生活方式,这能避免和预防那些传染病。
2. 这个措施能够让老百姓放弃那些糟糕的生活作风,如吸烟,酗酒,甚至是吸毒。这有些减少了社会犯罪率。
3.这种措施能节约政府对于社会医疗和治安的投资。
政府不应该负责:
1. 生活方式是一种人权,是个人的自由,如果被干涉,人们会感觉受到侮辱。
2. 很多生活方式虽然会造成一定的生理损害,但是却是可以接受的,因为它们带来了精神方面的好处,比如说吸烟缓解了精神压力。
范文待补充
7分:
政府应该保证人们健康的生活方式1:并不是每一个人都有健康方面的知识,一些广告或者不负责任的会诊医生会误导人们,增加不健康的生活方式的风险。
政府应该保证人们健康的生活方式2:如果人们的生活方式健康,经济会更加繁荣。工人身体健康,工作会更加高效。老年人少生病,孩子发展前景会更好。健康的年轻一代会保证经济稳定增长。
政府应该保证人们健康的生活方式3:由于人们的生活状态各不相同,政府应该加强基础建设,使用法律支持健康生活方式的建设,而不是覆盖所有的细节。
Healthy lifestyle is one of the most popular topics among urbanites. In this circumstance, government should hold the responsibility to encourage people to enjoy healthy lifestyle, not only because individuals could be gullible to confront healthy issues, but also as a high quality of physical conditions of citizens can stimulate economy.
Firstly, there are some arguments that governments may not be involved in personal healthy issues .However, as not everyone has enough knowledge and qualification on the aspect of health, they may just follow advertisings or unreliable consultants, which, inversely, could increase the potential risk of unhealthy lifestyle, since the inappropriate guidance from advertisings or consultants. Therefore, government should formulate policies to guide citizens to establish healthy lifestyles.
Secondly, with widespread healthy lifestyles, economy has more opportunities to achieve prosperity. With healthy body conditions, labors work more efficiently, elders suffer less diseases and children are promised better development, hence manufactures can produce more, the budget of social insurance and superannuation can be cut and healthy young generations will provide stability to the growth of economy.
Last but not least, as individuals may have different body conditions which mean that governments should be less effective to consider every situation. wheras, government should enhance infrastructure and use legislation to support the construction of healthy lifestyles instead of covering all the details
To conclude, governments should support healthy lifestyles both for the benefits of individuals and overall economy.
7分:
政府应该保证人们健康的生活方式:现在,很多人尤其是年轻人过着一种不健康的生活方式,比如聚会到很晚,影响身心健康。而且一些生活方式比如吸毒会给社会造成不好的影响。所以政府应该采取措施制止这些行为,保证人们回到正常的生活中。
个人有自由选择自己的生活方式:自由是每一个人的权利,应该受到尊重。而且大多数的人有能力选择适合自己的生活方式。
Nowadays, the topic related to who has the decision of individual’s lifestyle has been at the center of heated debates from both within and outside the public and social sectors. Some argue that government should be obliged to guarantee citizens get better health,. However others, myself included , treat lifestyle as an individual freedom.
Convincing arguments can be made that government should shoulder the responsibility. To start with, most people, especially youngsters, are now leading a unhealthy lifestyles. Therefore, One particularly noticeable example of this is some people always held parties far into the night which is damaging to their health mental and physical. Moreover, some lifestyle could have bad effects to others. Specifically, when someone is infatuated with drugs, which would bring calamity to any country and people. If the government takes measures to stop these actions, such as, prohibiting bars and clubs keep open after midnight, banning traffic in drugs completely, it is likely that people have to revert to a normal pattern of life.
Admittedly, there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary that individuals have the freedom to choose their own lifestyle. The reason for this is that freedom is the inherent right of individual, which should be fully respected. Meanwhile, the vast majority of people have the capacities to choose a lifestyle which is appropriate for his or herself. Admittedly, some teenagers lack self-control and judgment.
To put it in a nutshell, I would contend that the government should guide people to form healthier living habits, so as to be conductive to themselves and society as a whole. Despite that,
the right to choose one’s lifestyle should be respected to some extent as there is no unified view to the definition of health lifestyle.
7分:
政府应该控制人们的生活方式1:政府的主要功能是维护社会的稳定,而居民健康的生活方式是社会稳定的基础。所以政府保证人民健康的生活方式有利于社会和谐。
政府应该控制人们的生活方式2:不健康的生活方式对社会和个人造成不好的影响,比如吸毒和酗酒。
政府不应该干涉人们的生活方式1:健康的生活方式只是一个抽象的概念,政府也不可能保证人们需要遵守政府所定义的健康生活。即使政府这样做了,很明显会扼杀生活的多样性。
政府不应该干涉人们的生活方式2:如果政府干涉人们的私生活,剥夺了人们自由选择的权利。
The issue of whether government should hold responsibility for people’s healthy lifestyle has sparked off an intense debate. To my mind, governments should respect people’s rights on deciding their lifestyles.
Advocates of government’s dominant role in people’s lifestyles claim that the functions of a government and the costs of unhealthy lifestyles determine that governments have an obligation to make sure that people have healthy lifestyles. To begin with, the purpose of establishment of a government is to fulfill the essential function of maintaining social stability. Simultaneously, healthy lifestyles of citizens lay the foundation of social order. Hence, ensuring that people have healthy lifestyles is conducive to social harmony as well as performing of government’s functions. In addition, without proper lifestyles, individuals and societies alike would fall victim to its destructive influence. It is not uncommon that a considerable extension of unhealthy lifestyle is associated with some undesirable consequences. Drug and alcohol abuse is a good case in point. If local governments do not limit the misuse of drug and alcohol, an increase in crime rate and widespread vandalism will ensue.
On the other hand, opponents argue that it is pointless for government to interfere in civilian private life. First of all, healthy lifestyle is an abstract concept and by no means confined to a defined as well as unique prescription. That means it is costly and even impossible for government to ensure that people have lifestyles in conformity with the definition set by the government. Even if the government can do so, it inevitably leads to stifle the expression of diverse personality. Furthermore, government’s intervention in personal lifestyle, in no small measure, deprives people of freedom of choices. This is especially unacceptable in modern democratic countries because it run counter to the spirit of democracy that human rights should deserve full consideration and respect. Any obstacles to the realization of reasonable human rights are unwarranted by the public.
To conclude, I concede that government can play a dominant as well as favourable role in the daily life of citizens. However, this does not necessarily mean that government can interfere with people private life. I believe that civilians are entitled to live in a way that they wish and have a freedom of choice in terms of their lifestyles.
7分:
认为应政府负责:1. 保证公民的身体健康是政府的基本责任之一。2. 有利于营造全民的健康氛围。3. 政府可以联合很多营养学家,制定的方法更加科学,更加系统。认为应个人负责:1. 更加个性化,更符合个人需求,人们能够严格遵守。2. 促进人们之间彼此的交流,相互学习。3. 人们有权利去监督并反馈食品的健康安全。
Healthy dietary habit is being ignored by modern people thanks to the rapid living pace. However, in the meantime, whether governments should enact a standardised healthy diet to public has sparked much debate therefore it deserves people to analyse.
No one fails to admit that a healthy diet enacted by government is favourable for citizens. First and foremost, ensuring the public’s physical health is a basic obligation of government so that government should take some effective measures to help citizen to make healthy diets thereby committing their responsibility. More importantly, governments are able to associate with a number of professional nutritionists to research more reasonable and systematic healthy diets thereby providing citizens with a scientific healthy dietary plan, which individuals cannot do it just rely on their own experience. In addition, government’s behaviours are much easier to establish a healthy atmosphere among the public than personal behaviours since more people prefer to give trust to government’s authority, consequently, public’s health awareness can be effectively enhanced during this process.
Based on previous analysis, even though government’s measure seemingly occupies the overwhelming advantages, in some specific circumstances, the significance of the public ideas also should not be ignored. To begin with, each citizen can enact a personalized scheme which they can abide strictly depend on their different requirements, on the other hand, government’s standardized plan, one way or another, might not achieve such effect. What’s more, in the context of such public atmosphere, people can share their healthy ideas with each other via their mutual communication. Citizens’ healthy experience will be gradually expended during this process, while, compare with such information exchange, government’s standardized diets maybe slightly rigid.
In summary, depending on previous analysis, an apparent conclusion can be obtained that government’s behaviour is as important as individual bahaviour and both of them are indispensable for cultivating healthy dietary habits. Overall, I firmly believe that each individual can enjoy his/her healthy life as long as he/she can find a most suitable dietary plan for himself/herself.
5分:
首先,作者不同意“政府有责任决定居民的生活方式”,尽管它的目的是让人们生活得更加健康。因为这对政府和居民都没有益处,政府很难知道个人的喜好,这样政府投资的钱就会错误,最终导致当地经济下滑。同时,居民也得不到他喜欢的,结果一种不满足感会导致很多负面的情绪,比如不喜欢工作,对生活没有热情等等。
作者认为个人有权利选择自己的生活方式。这样政府就没有必要设置大量的器材,会节省很多的钱。
缺点:论述不充分
Who should decide the residents’ life style? From my perspective, it is individuals’ right to choose what sort of life they take.
Currently, there exits two main thoughts about who make decisions for our lives. Some people convince that it is government’s duty to decide residents’ lifestyle which i cannot agree with even though it has an intention to make people’s life healthier. Apparently there would not be benefits for both the authorities and citizens since the government can hardly get to know what an individual prefer most, therefore the money from the government would be invested in a wrong way with a result of a decrease of local economy. Citizens, meanwhile, can also get seldom advantages since he cannot do what he is fond of and then, as a consequence, a sense of unsatisfying would occur which can result in many negative facts such as disliking to work, having no passion of life or catching emotional disease, etc.
Another voice that i consider appropriate is that the right to choose a life model should be given to individuals. It is evidently no one has a deeper understanding about a person’s preference compared with himself and what differs from the first view is that is is needless for the government to integrate the public’s lifestyle thereby saving no matter the money or the time. The reason is that there is no need to build a vast number of facilities which have no attractions to the public which should be spent much money and at least several months.
On balance, i support that all the people owe to be permitted to live their own lives. By doing this, the maximum of freedom can be distribute to the public and the number of conflicts between governments and citizens would decrease.